On 07-01-11 11:52, Peter Firmstone wrote:
very brief summary of the process (missing details): if we're happy with the code, we need to review the documentation, decide on a version number, add release notes for this release, then we build, sign and upload the artefact's to make them available for review, vote on the release artefact's then post a release vote to IPMC, once this passes, we upload the release artefact's, then they become available from the apache mirror sites.
I've coded this into a http://wiki.apache.org/river/ReleaseProcedure wiki page.
What does review the documentation have as deliverable? Gr. Sim -- QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
