On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 16:11, Peter Firmstone wrote: > With the namespace change, some proxy's may not find the > org.apache.river.* classes they need in existing deployed clients, > rather than increase the size of jsk-dl.jar (river-dl.jar in the modular > build), we could create another jar, perhaps called namespace-compat-dl.jar? > > Something like this would be required regardless of the build > environment, but to avoid conflicts with existing deployed codebases, > jsk-dl.jar should also be renamed. > > Thoughts? > > Peter.
I would think that one would deploy the appropriate downloadable jars with their service. Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see a problem. If a client is running and you deploy a new version of the service (with associated downloadable jars), the old proxy should fail, the client downloads a new proxy and continues on. That's the Jini way. Or do I misunderstand the question? Cheers, Greg. -- Greg Trasuk, President StratusCom Manufacturing Systems Inc. - We use information technology to solve business problems on your plant floor. http://stratuscom.com
