+1 On Feb 1, 2011, at 6:30 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > Sim IJskes - QCG wrote: >> On 01-02-11 12:40, Dan Creswell wrote: >>> Ah, I know Sim is gonna hate this but I feel the need to retain full context >>> for now.... >> What i would prefer to see is: >> - a use case defining internet deployment >> - a proof of concept prototype implementing this use case >> - define lessons learned >> If it turns out that there is something in the lookup what needs >> improvement, then we can change that. >> Better not use internet deployment in requirements discussions before whe >> have defined what it is. Thats too vague for me. > > I agree. > > If implementing Internet deployment is either impossible regardless of the > proposed changes, or can be done well without them, then making the changes > would be a mistake. > > The easiest way to be sure about this is a use-case and proof of concept > prototype. The prototype can be used to demonstrate how proposed River > changes contribute to implementing the use-case. > > Patricia >
Michael McGrady Chief Architect Topia Technology, Inc. Cel 1.253.720.3365 Work 1.253.572.9712 extension 2037 mmcgr...@topiatechnology.com
