A general advice; Instead of starting off vote threads, try "inclusive discussion of change" so there is less of a Yes/No position to things. It is not always needed to be as elaborate as Peter's exhaustive approach, but in general this leads to engagement, thinking and formalizing the requirements, instead of passive 'decision making'.
Cheers Niclas On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG <s...@qcg.nl> wrote: > Dear voters, > > I'm happy with the votes on the JDK5 vote, but could you also cast your vote > on the 1.4 ballot? > > I a few days i will tally both, and post the results on the website. > > Gr. Sim > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
