Hi, Matt,
I'm using rivet and websh.
Rive does not support Apache2. I think it is a weak point.
But Rivet is very stable.
I'm using it since 3 or 4 years ago. and actualy I've never got any
probrems.
And, Rivet's syntax is easy to understand. It's very simple.
It may be other advantage.
The other hand, Websh has very strong framework, such as session managemant.
I think it is an advantage.
And websh supports Apache2. it may be another advantage.
But websh's syntax, I think, it is never understandable;-)
if you are using simple <? ... ?> scripts, I think you must rewrite
many scripts.
Some days ago, I rewrote my rivet script to websh.
Additionaly, Rivet and websh are supports tcl unicode framework.
but websh has a bug. So if you want to make l10n/m17n site,
you will get fatal probrems.
And websh has other bug. it open tmp file using mode '644'. So all
local users will be able to read it.
I've made patches for fix them, and posted it to websh-devel ML.
But I've never got any resp;-(
Thanks,
Taguchi,T.
P.S. By the way, How about AOL server?
I think it is not so bad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
