On Sep 16, 2005, at 12:51 AM, David N. Welton wrote:
Karl Lehenbauer wrote:
IMHO there is zero reason for Rivet to have a release number < 1.0.
Considering how solid it is and how heavily my company and some
nonprofits I support are using it, I think a 2.0 number is in order.
How about we do 1.0 just to avoid people asking "well, where is
1.0, did
I miss it?".
I second Karl's motion on jumping to 2.0. I think the appeal for new
users of being able to see and obtain the 2.0 release is worth having
to explain to existing folks that the version system changed; it's
hard to imagine anyone being upset that the new version is too high
of a number compared to what they're currently running.
Didn't PostgreSQL jump from 0.03 to 1.0 to 6.0 or something? That
seemed to work out OK.
Best,
Daniel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
