On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:39 +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: > > 1. rkhunter.conf out of the box needs several modifications. My > suggestion is and remains, that tailored rkhunter.conf-s will be > installed; depending on the uname. > I would suggest submitting this into the sourceforge tracker system. It will then get considered (and not lost) - but that does not mean that it will be accepted!
> 2. Apache still furnishes a warning, whatever I Ido: > APP_WHITELIST="httpd" > APP_WHITELIST="httpd:1.3.29" > Neither spares me from the warning mail about an infected system; it > actually is the only warning. > [10:54:53] Info: Application 'gpg' not found. > [10:54:53] Checking version of Apache [ Warning ] > [10:54:54] Warning: Application 'httpd', version '1.3.29', is out of > date, and possibly a security risk. > Can you check the log file. As far as I remember it should show what versions it is comparing. > 3. This sequence tends to make me smile: > Performing OpenBSD specific checks > Checking sockstat and netstat commands [ Skipped ] > That default rkhunter.conf skips on OpenBSD what is explicitly written for it. > Again, check the log file. It will say why it is skipping the test (from what I remember it will be due to missing commands on your system). John. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287 E-mail: john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Rkhunter-users mailing list Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
