On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 17:51 -0400, Brian McKee wrote: > > My questions are > - now that the rkhunter has been reworked pretty extensively in > the last few releases, do you really see that much churn in the > options list ahead? > Yes and no :-) I think RKH has enough command-line options to avoid most system peculiarities, so there shouldn't be that much change. Having said that I would like to rework the 'rootdir' stuff, and that could involve an actual set of options for use with rootdir. So there could be a few more options added. Of course, it may never happen... who can say :-)
> - would you be willing to include it, and just dump it or move it > to 'contrib' in the future if you find it getting dated? That seems > more reasonable to me than rejecting it just because it might not get > maintained later. > I think your best bet would be to put all this into the Sourceforge tracker system for rkhunter (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=155034), and then we'll look at it at some point. That way it won't get forgotten about. Thanks very much for contributing it. John. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287 E-mail: john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Rkhunter-users mailing list Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
