On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 at 21:56, unsp...@hushmail.com wrote: > Looks like a good addition to me.
It's been a long time, so...what's the process here? Should I resend the patch to someone special? Or is this still pending review and I just have to be patient? >> I could not find a rkhunter routine to check for "suspicious >> cronjobs". Would adding such a routine still be within the scope >> of rkhunter? > > We could add a test for this one specifically NP. I was more curious about the general rationale, as I would imagine that *lots* of other malware may be creating suspicious cronjobs as well. Thanks, Christian. -- BOFH excuse #40: not enough memory, go get system upgrade ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Rkhunter-users mailing list Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
