It boils down to whatever you are most comfortable with. In my case I want to 
be notified of every change and resolve in my own mind whether this was due to 
a known update or if the change was from an unknown source. But in my case 
updates are infrequent so it's not that much of a burden to review the list. If 
you have files that are updated daily and you don't want to be notified about 
them, then whitelist them. That's what I do with executables that have been 
replaced by scripts, but I want to know about all the other changes.

-Al-

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:50 AM, Sivabs via Rkhunter-users wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> of course I check logs.
> 
> For example, I often receive this kind of warnings:
> 
> (example from Debian server)
> 
> Warning: The file properties have changed:
> 
>          File: /usr/bin/perl
> 
>          Current hash: 10d1463ca9952340f54f90dcf6df816d9b6e4296
> 
>          Stored hash : d5b3b0dffdface2036d783b8770b385eb527e89f
> 
>          Current inode: 393362  Stored inode: 393364
> 
>          Current file modification time: 1496680638 (05-Jun-2017 18:37:18)
> 
>          Stored file modification time : 1469627943 (27-Jul-2016 15:59:03)
> 
> 
> 
> (example from CentOS with WHM server)
> 
> ---------------------- Start Rootkit Hunter Scan ----------------------
> 
> Warning: Package manager verification has failed:
> 
>          File: /bin/su
> 
>          The file permissions have changed
> 
>          The file group has changed
> 
> Warning: Package manager verification has failed:
> 
>          File: /usr/bin/newgrp
> 
>          The file permissions have changed
> 
> I know that this is OK, as I recently upgraded perl on several Debian OS and 
> WHM auto-updates itself every night.
> 
> My question is: how do you manage those situations?
> 
> Do you disable specific tests, as they report almost every day similar 
> warnings?
> 
> Do you bypass control over specific file (eg. /bin/su, /usr/bin/newgrp)?
> 
> Thank you
> 
> 
> 
>> Il 6 giugno 2017 alle 23.53 Dimitri Yioulos <dyiou...@netatlantic.com 
>> <mailto:dyiou...@netatlantic.com>> ha scritto:
>> 
>> I hope I’m not asking the obvious, but have you had a look at rkhunter.log?  
>> The will probably give you some very good insight into what you may want to 
>> do, configuration-wise, to stop the false positives.
>> 
>>  
>>  
>> From: Sivabs via Rkhunter-users [mailto:rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net>] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 5:41 PM
>> To: rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> Subject: [Rkhunter-users] Configuration tips?
>> 
>>  
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I run RK on several server (>50).
>> 
>> After every update/upgrade, I receive lots of warnings, but since most OS 
>> are identical in my environment, I can easily determine if there is a false 
>> positive or not.
>> 
>> Anyway, everyday it is a lot of work :)
>> 
>> I wondering if someone wants to share some hints to minimize false 
>> positives, I mean: do you run every test? If not, what test are disabled in 
>> your configuration?
>> 
>> Thank you!
>> 
> 
>  
> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! 
>> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ 
>> <http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________>
>> Rkhunter-users mailing list
>> Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users 
>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! 
> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ 
> <http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________>
> Rkhunter-users mailing list
> Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
> <mailto:Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users>
-Al-
-- 
Al Varnell
Mountain View, CA





Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users

Reply via email to