Thanks for the response Al.

I took on the maintenance job without knowing about these version
differences in the infrastructure and don't know much about RKHunter. The
docs aren't very well documented (or that I can't find them properly) so I
can't tell what has been changed between any version.

And no, I don't actually have a "/path/to/exclude/bla/bla". That's just
silly. The actual path is more like "/opt/com/apps/bin/connect/". Anyways,
the path is actual and exists but I doubt that's relevant at this point.

I'll try to convince the clients to upgrade RKHunter to the latest version.

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 5:09 PM Al Varnell via Rkhunter-users <
rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> My first reaction is why would you use anything older than version 1.4.6
> which is the current supported version with many bug fixes and looks for
> current rootkits? Those two versions are five and seven years old now and
> probably won't find any RK's in use today.
>
> So you actually have a “/path/to/exclude/bla/bla” that needs to be
> excluded? There is nothing like that in the current /etc/rkhunter.conf, so
> unless you have a actual path named that, delete the entry.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> -Al-
>
> > On Mar 5, 2019, at 20:39, Abdul Qoyyuum <aqoyy...@cardaccess.com.au>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello fellow sysadmins,
> >
> > New to the mailing list. A system infrastructure that I'm maintaining
> has a problem with RKHunter. Even more so that the RKHunter version is not
> the same across all virtual machines. Some are on 1.4.0 and some are on
> 1.4.2. When `rkhunter --propupd` is ran by puppet, this shows up in the
> logs:
> >
> > Invalid USER_FILEPROP_FILES_DIRS configuration option: Relative
> pathname: !/path/to/exclude/bla/bla
> >
> > In correspondence to my /etc/rkhunter.conf:
> >
> > USER_FILEPROP_FILES_DIRS="!/path/to/exclude/bla/bla"
> >
> > This is only affected on RKHunter version 1.4.2 and above. The thought
> of downgrading to make this work is silly and I can't find anything in the
> docs/wiki for making this work for the later version. On another hand,
> commenting out that config line and running `rkhunter --propupd` again did
> make it pass but it look longer than expected to complete as opposed to the
> RKHunter version 1.4.0 environments.
> >
> > Any help is appreciated thanks.
> > --
> > Abdul Qoyyuum Bin Haji Abdul Kadir
> > HP No: +673 720 8043
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rkhunter-users mailing list
> > Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rkhunter-users mailing list
> Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
>


-- 
Abdul Qoyyuum Bin Haji Abdul Kadir
HP No: +673 720 8043
_______________________________________________
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users

Reply via email to