Hi, On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 22:17:57 +0100 d_jan <d_...@ymail.com> wrote: > Am 01.01.2016 um 22:07 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > > > On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 21:41:49 +0100 > > d_jan <d_...@ymail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I had thought about tabs, too, a bit. But how do you hide all > > previews? > > If none of the checkboxes are checked, no preview or code is shown. If > one is checked, one tab is visible, if both, two tabs. (Does this make > sense? Otherwise I send a sketch or so)
I think, I understand. Well, let's see. May make sense. In any case, this implies that there are controls for preview visibility somewhere _outside_ the preview region itself. Based on this, I know how to proceed for the moment (some more technical difficulties left to solve, though). After that we can return to look at the best layout _within_ the preview region. > > (There's also the - minor - issue that this would only allow one > > preview at a time.) > > > > Alternatively, we could also insert some kind of title (and even a > > close/collapse button) above each preview, without needing tabs. > > Sounds good, but I can't imagein how this would look right now. Do you > have a sketch or so? Well, a very(!) rough sketch is now in work/generalized_preview. Still for the code preview, only, and not sporting a close/collapse button, either, yet. Here, (active) previews would simply be stacked, vertically. Regards Thomas
pgpnUEjF5aIJY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
