On 2017-07-29 09:26, Aaron Batty wrote:
Ugh, sorry for the delay. Nothing was set up on this thing because I
usually boot Ubuntu on it. There is nothing as thoroughly obnoxious as
an enterprise-managed Windows machine.

Anyway, it looks like rk.anova is installed by default, but the
problem comes up when trying to install ez:

Warning: package 'ez' was built under R version 3.2.5
Error in loadNamespace(j <- i[[1L]], c(lib.loc, .libPaths()),
versionCheck = vI[[j]]) :
  there is no package called 'Matrix'
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : could not find function "ezANOVA"
When I tried to just let it run, it didn't say it couldn't find ez,
but when I try running it now, it says it can't. Also, there was some
error about not being able to uninstall Matrix first...

I put in the https repository, but that didn't change anything (of
course--that's just for the RK packages, right?).

Yes. Doesn't help the issue that CRAN no longer has packages for 3.2.x

What can we do? I'm expecting mostly Windows users among these
students...

Like I said, the options are
a) Use the 0.7.0 preview on Windows. This "should" work, but you'll have some minor UI differences between that and 0.6.5b on Mac.
b) Roll your own bundle with R 3.3.3 as outlined in my previous mail.
c) Wait for me to do this. In fact I'm just getting started to, but I cannot promise when I will get around to finish this.

[...]

So sorry to be down to the wire on this. I have been watching the
dev list and site and since there hasn't been a new version since
last fall, I didn't think I needed to check everything again. I'm
lucky that I had to make a new final for this course and wanted to
generate the model answers, which led me to the problem...

Yeah, totally annoying when things just break behind (y)our back(s). Don't worry, we'll find a workable solution before Monday.

(And staying on top will become considerably easier, once we finally have a KF5-based 0.7.0, and can work with a supported toolchain, again; we're mostly just missing some build scripts on Mac, and some finishing touches, there).

Regards
Thomas

Reply via email to