hi, Am Samstag, 14. April 2018, 21:05:35 CEST schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > meik michalke <meik.micha...@uni-duesseldorf.de> wrote: > > i've configured the portfile to use the "releases/0.7.0" branch from > > git, is that ok, too, or should i rather use the tarball and checksum? > > > > if it's ok, i've a ready built package i could already upload to > > incoming. > > The good thing about building those packages ourselves is that we don't > have to worry about bureaucracy, too much. So, yes, that's totally > fine. I'm building the Windows package like that, too. > > I've built the tarball from revision > d68da587775f4a795cfc00fbe78f64b5d8c9fb43. The only change since then is > in directories that are not part of the tarball. (I'll add a tag in a > minute).
what just crossed my mind: i should have merged the update to the portfile for the final release, as the one included looks like 0.7.0 doesn't have a release candidate: https://cgit.kde.org/rkward.git/tree/macports/kf5/kf5-rkward-binary/Portfile? h=v0.7.0 see https://cgit.kde.org/rkward.git/commit/? id=d0829218a3a75829327c315e20fba3ab3083a3c6 damn. viele grüße :: m.eik -- dipl. psych. meik michalke institut f"ur experimentelle psychologie abt. f"ur diagnostik und differentielle psychologie heinrich-heine-universit"at d-40204 d"usseldorf
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.