Hi, On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier <thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote: > Hi, > > BTW, I encountered some surprising behavior: > When you add a plot using "Append this plot", the plot-call appears to be > lost. Appending in any other way makes the plot-call is shown as expected. Is > this intentional or a bug?
It should not get lost! Do you see 'NA'? It should at least use the old behavior of 'X: xlab, Y: ylab, main'. Now the code may not always be able to find xlab / ylab / main from the recorded plot. For example, the structure of a recorded (recorded using recordPlot ()) lattice plot is completely different from base graphics: xyplot (0~0) a <- recordPlot () str (a) # insanely huge pairlist structure In such cases the old hack for extracting xlab / ylab / main will not yield anything. The "Append this plot" is supposed to be a safe guard action: append _any_ displayed plot no matter what its state / type is, using recordPlot (). For example, any call that does not go through, plot.new () / persp () / print.trellis () should still be appended to the history by this action. In such cases it may not possible, at least not with the current implementation, to extract any information at all. Regards, -- Prasenjit ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
