Hi, On Sunday 12 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote: > I was wondering, if we should remove the "Plot properties" action > completely? With the drop down list implemented, is it needed any > more? There are two extra bits of information there: (1) size of the > current plot and (2) complete plot call. Now, (1) may be useful to the > user, given that we have implemented size restriction. But (2) may not > be useful at all. What do you think?
True, it's not terribly useful any longer (personally, I'd rather see a
usecase remaining for 2, rather than 1). But I don't think it adds much
confusion or complexity, so why not just keep it?
> > I did not look at the code in any detail so far, and will wait with that
> > until you remove all the debugging calls (whenever you feel comfortable
> > with that).
>
> Assuming there are no major issues / bugs, say till Wednesday ("testing
> phase")?
Ok.
As a side-note, in case you are not aware of that function, you may want to
have a look at ?trace. It's a pretty useful debugging function, esp. when you
want to find out when a function is entered / left.
Regards
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
