Hi, On Saturday 27 April 2013 11:13:47 meik michalke wrote: > would a check (for the mere existence of the very expected R binary file) in > RKWard's startup sequence perhaps be a better place for this? at least it > would also grant us with an informative error message if the problem occurs > later, like after an incompatible R upgrade.
hm. Actually, there _is_ such a test in the wrapper script. I wonder why this did not trigger... Will have to investigate. Regards Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
_______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
