Hi, On Sunday 24 August 2014 12:35:16 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > > I'm uncertain, whether we should > > a) use S3-method markup, anyway > > b) rename HTML.cormat to HTMLcormat, breaking the API (although of course > > we could keep a deprecated HTML.cormat along with a)) > > c) Ignore the note, assuming that CRAN maintainers will be ok with it. > > > > I tend to think, b) may be the best option after all. > > Breaking the API because of a silly WARNING does not seem like the best > option to me. Why not a) instead, since it has no effect on the actual > code, just on the docs? The doc page makes it obvious anyway that it's > not a S3 method.
well, a) is certainly the easiest option, by all means. The (acceptable) downside to this is that the usage-section will then be rendered as ## S3 method for class 'cormat' HTML(x,[...]) while you really have to call HTML.cormat(). The example section is not affected, though. As the package maintainer, it's your call ;-). Regards Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
