On Wednesday 16 November 2005 14:07, Catalin Muresan wrote:
> poti sa dai un tcpdump pe client
>
> tcpdump -ni eth0 udp port 123
>
> in timp ce dai ntpdate 10.0.0.2
>
> tx.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ntpdate -u 10.0.0.2
16 Nov 14:37:35 ntpdate[23795]: no server suitable for synchronization found

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# tcpdump -ni eth0 udp port 123
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
14:37:31.053297 IP 10.0.0.19.38826 > 10.0.0.2.ntp: NTPv4, Client, length 48
14:37:32.058076 IP 10.0.0.19.38826 > 10.0.0.2.ntp: NTPv4, Client, length 48
14:37:33.062896 IP 10.0.0.19.38826 > 10.0.0.2.ntp: NTPv4, Client, length 48
14:37:34.067704 IP 10.0.0.19.38826 > 10.0.0.2.ntp: NTPv4, Client, length 48

4 packets captured
4 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#

Un nou tcpdump dat de data asta verbose, arata cam asa:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ntpdate -u 10.0.0.2
16 Nov 14:45:01 ntpdate[24174]: no server suitable for synchronization found

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# tcpdump -v -ni eth0 udp port 123
tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
14:44:57.568226 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 17, 
length: 76) 10.0.0.19.38839 > 10.0.0.2.ntp: NTPv4, length 48
        Client, Leap indicator: clock unsynchronized (192), Stratum 0, poll 
4s, precision -6
        Root Delay: 1.000000, Root dispersion: 1.000000, Reference-ID: 
(unspec)
          Reference Timestamp:  0.000000000
          Originator Timestamp: 0.000000000
          Receive Timestamp:    0.000000000
          Transmit Timestamp:   3341133897.568203999 (2005/11/16 14:44:57)
            Originator - Receive Timestamp:  0.000000000
            Originator - Transmit Timestamp: 3341133897.568203999 (2005/11/16 
14:44:57)
14:44:58.573009 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  64, id 1, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 17, 
length: 76) 10.0.0.19.38839 > 10.0.0.2.ntp: NTPv4, length 48
        Client, Leap indicator: clock unsynchronized (192), Stratum 0, poll 
4s, precision -6
        Root Delay: 1.000000, Root dispersion: 1.000000, Reference-ID: 
(unspec)
          Reference Timestamp:  0.000000000
          Originator Timestamp: 0.000000000
          Receive Timestamp:    0.000000000
          Transmit Timestamp:   3341133898.572992999 (2005/11/16 14:44:58)
            Originator - Receive Timestamp:  0.000000000
            Originator - Transmit Timestamp: 3341133898.572992999 (2005/11/16 
14:44:58)
14:44:59.577819 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  64, id 2, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 17, 
length: 76) 10.0.0.19.38839 > 10.0.0.2.ntp: NTPv4, length 48
        Client, Leap indicator: clock unsynchronized (192), Stratum 0, poll 
4s, precision -6
        Root Delay: 1.000000, Root dispersion: 1.000000, Reference-ID: 
(unspec)
          Reference Timestamp:  0.000000000
          Originator Timestamp: 0.000000000
          Receive Timestamp:    0.000000000
          Transmit Timestamp:   3341133899.577802999 (2005/11/16 14:44:59)
            Originator - Receive Timestamp:  0.000000000
            Originator - Transmit Timestamp: 3341133899.577802999 (2005/11/16 
14:44:59)
14:45:00.582631 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  64, id 3, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 17, 
length: 76) 10.0.0.19.38839 > 10.0.0.2.ntp: NTPv4, length 48
        Client, Leap indicator: clock unsynchronized (192), Stratum 0, poll 
4s, precision -6
        Root Delay: 1.000000, Root dispersion: 1.000000, Reference-ID: 
(unspec)
          Reference Timestamp:  0.000000000
          Originator Timestamp: 0.000000000
          Receive Timestamp:    0.000000000
          Transmit Timestamp:   3341133900.582614999 (2005/11/16 14:45:00)
            Originator - Receive Timestamp:  0.000000000
            Originator - Transmit Timestamp: 3341133900.582614999 (2005/11/16 
14:45:00)

Alx
>
> On 11/16/05, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sal Lucian,
> >
> > > 123/udp open|filtered ntp
> > >
> > > mai verifica totusi firewall-ul de pe 10.1.1.2...
> >
> > de pe 10.0.0.2 (care este serverul de timp) dau catre clientul meu
> > (10.0.0.19)
> >
> > # ping -R 10.0.0.19
> > PING 10.0.0.19 (10.0.0.19) 56(124) bytes of data.
> > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.19: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.292 ms
> > RR:     10.0.0.2
> >         10.0.0.19
> >         10.0.0.19
> >         10.0.0.2
> >
> > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.300 ms        (same
> > route) 64 bytes from 10.0.0.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.311 ms       
> > (same route)
> >
> > de pe client (10.0.0.19) dau in server (10.0.0.2)
> >
> > # ping -R 10.0.0.2
> > PING 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2) 56(124) bytes of data.
> > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.332 ms
> > RR:     10.0.0.19
> >         10.0.0.2
> >         10.0.0.2
> >         10.0.0.19
> >
> > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.320 ms (same route)
> > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.260 ms (same route)
> >
> > Acum, mai dau si firewall-ul jos (pe ambele masini trec pe default):
> > # iptables -L -n
> > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> > target     prot opt source               destination
> >
> > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
> > target     prot opt source               destination
> >
> > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> > target     prot opt source               destination
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
> >
> > Deci cu siguranta acum portul 123 UDP este deschis, foarte deschis chiar
> > daca nmap-ul raporteaza si un filtered ...  Este el un pic confuz, dar
> > portul este deschis.
> > 123/udp open|filtered ntp (asta inseamna deschis sau filtrat)
> >
> > Dau sa ma sincronizez cu serverul de pe clientul 10.0.0.19:
> > # ntpdate -u 10.0.0.2
> > 16 Nov 10:42:43 ntpdate[9117]: no server suitable for synchronization
> > found
> >
> > Deci nu merge!!!! In schimb, de pe un RH7.2 care se afla remote (in bv)
> > si mai trece si printr-un tunel VPN, dau:
> >
> > # ntpq  -p
> >      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset 
> > jitter
> > =========================================================================
> >===== 10.0.0.2        0.0.0.0         16 u    - 1024    0    0.000   
> > 0.000 4000.00 *LOCAL(0)        LOCAL(0)        10 l   52   64  377   
> > 0.000    0.000   0.008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] alx_bkup]# ntpdate -u 10.0.0.2
> > 16 Nov 10:34:01 ntpdate[26124]: step time server 10.0.0.2 offset
> > 230.975701 sec
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] alx_bkup]# date
> > Wed Nov 16 10:34:17 EET 2005
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] alx_bkup]# ntpdate -u 10.0.0.2
> > 16 Nov 10:34:44 ntpdate[26129]: adjust time server 10.0.0.2 offset
> > 0.002209 sec
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] alx_bkup]# ntpq -p
> >      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset 
> > jitter
> > =========================================================================
> >===== 10.0.0.2        0.0.0.0         16 u    - 1024    0    0.000   
> > 0.000 4000.00 *LOCAL(0)        LOCAL(0)        10 l  288   64  377   
> > 0.000    0.000   0.008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] alx_bkup]#
> >
> > Ce pusca mea nu e in regula?
> >
> > Pe masina RH7.2 de la brasov am:
> > # rpm -q ntp
> > ntp-4.1.1-1
> >
> > pe serverul de timp cit si pe clientul 10.0.0.19 am centos 4 cu:
> > # rpm -q ntp
> > ntp-4.2.0.a.20040617-4
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RLUG mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
>
> _______________________________________________
> RLUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug

_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug

Raspunde prin e-mail lui