On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:33:14AM +0200, Alexandru Ionica wrote: > > > >> 2. getent passwd si vezi asa daca merge nss_ldap > > > > Working, though: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# getent passwd lucica > > lucica:x:3001:3000:lucica:/home/lucica:/bin/bash > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# getent shadow lucica > > <nimic> > normal sa "nimic" atita timp cand pam si nss nu se leaga la ldap cu uid de > admin tot timpu. "nimic" in sensul ca tre sa iti intoarca ceva de genu: > adonix:~ # getent shadow gremlin > gremlin:x:12345::99999:7:::0 > fara parola, dar astea tre sa le dea ... 'getent shadow lucica' nu da nimic. In schimb pt. useri din /etc/shadow scrie ce ar trebui. Asta nu mi se pare normal. nss problem? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# su - lucica > > I have no [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pwd > > /home/lucica > seteaza pamu bine 'I have no name' nu tot nss problem? Ce treaba are pam-ul? Am uitat de ceva in afara de /etc/pam.d/*? De fapt, sunt prost. In /etc/pam.d/su apare:
auth sufficient pam_wheel.so trust auth sufficient pam_rootok.so Inainte de pam_ldap.so. Deci nici macar nu incearca sa faca ceva cu ldap. Or am I wrong? Oricum, nicaieri nu am vazut alte configurari la /etc/pam_ldap.conf. Luci Stanescu _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
