On Wednesday 07 December 2005 10:42, WiFi wrote: > > confunzi ceea ce raporteaza nortonul (care e prost prin definitie) cu > > ceea ce gasesti in db-ul cu definitii al altui antivirus. > > Nu am confundat, insa am dat si numele de la noton pt o identificare mai > usoara.
E posibil ca Norton sa-l denumeasca intr-un fel si clamav intr-un alt fel. > > ca idee, scanezi in arhive zip? > > tail -f /var/amavis/clamd.log > Wed Dec 7 10:25:11 2005 -> Archive: Recursion level limit set to 5. > Wed Dec 7 10:25:11 2005 -> Archive: Files limit set to 1000. > Wed Dec 7 10:25:11 2005 -> Archive: Compression ratio limit set to 250. > Wed Dec 7 10:25:11 2005 -> Archive support enabled. > Wed Dec 7 10:25:11 2005 -> Archive: RAR support disabled. > Wed Dec 7 10:25:11 2005 -> Portable Executable support enabled. > Wed Dec 7 10:25:11 2005 -> Mail files support enabled. > Wed Dec 7 10:25:11 2005 -> OLE2 support enabled. > Wed Dec 7 10:25:11 2005 -> HTML support enabled. > Wed Dec 7 10:25:11 2005 -> Self checking every 1800 seconds. > > din log-ul de mai sus, inteleg ca nu este validat suportul pt arhive > .rar, insa nici nu stiu cum pot sa-l validez... Ma poti ajuta? > Multumesc! Cred ca e suficient sa instalezi unrar pe sistemul ala, amavis detecteaza tot ce are nevoie (doar daca nu ai manarit amavis.conf). Frate, mai pune-ti mintea la contributie... -- Serghei. TOP POSTING SUX _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
