bottom boring posting: Vlad Constantinescu wrote: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Luci Stanescu wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:36:12PM +0300, Vlad Constantinescu wrote: >>> Din pacate nu sunt prea bun la ASCII art sa incerc o reprezentare. >> Macar tabelele de routare si un iptables -t nat -nL (si orice mai este >> relevant)? >> > > Cam asa arata setarile. > > > route -n > > > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > 194.102.58.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > br0 > 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth2 > 85.120.46.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth2 > 0.0.0.0 194.102.58.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > br0 > > iptables -L -n -t nat > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination > > Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination > MASQUERADE all -- 10.10.10.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 > > Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination > > > > Inca o chestie ciudata; de pe un calculator cu IP 10.10.10... se poate > vedea reteaua cu 85, si partea de reta cu 194 aflata de partea 'interna' a > bridge-ului; dar nimic pe 'extern'.
Vlad, cum arata regula ta cu MASQUERADE ? de ip forwarding nu ai uitat, nu/da? deci eth0 cu eth1 = br0 ? un "ip ro" ? > > Multumesc, > Vlad > > > > >> Luci Stanescu >> > > > > > > -- Daniel Petre, Consultant IT, S.C. Delfix Media S.R.L. http://www.delfix.ro _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
