On 06/10/2011 12:46 PM, Emil Furniga wrote: > Pe un CentOS unde am facut prostia sa instalez din rpm un pachet Shorewall > (si nu din yum), nu e nici o prostie. instalarea direct cu rpm e cit se poate de corecta.
> dupa care cand sa zicem ca m-am desteptat am facut rpm -e > pachetul_shorewall. Dupa asta instalai cu yum install corect pe shorewall > asta. Acum cand dau : > rpm -ql shorewall > (contains no files) > > obtin raspunsul cu "no files" zi-mi ce returneaza rpm -qV shorewall rpm -q --requires shorewall Poate ca pur si simplu shorewall e de fapt un metapachet creat doar ca sa instaleze alte pachete, precum: [root@razvan-g ~]# rpm -ql wine (contains no files) [root@razvan-g ~]# rpm -q --requires wine wine-core = 1.1.34-0.el5.mh wine-capi = 1.1.34-0.el5.mh wine-cms = 1.1.34-0.el5.mh wine-desktop = 1.1.34-0.el5.mh wine-esd = 1.1.34-0.el5.mh wine-jack = 1.1.34-0.el5.mh wine-ldap = 1.1.34-0.el5.mh wine-nas = 1.1.34-0.el5.mh wine-tools = 1.1.34-0.el5.mh wine-twain = 1.1.34-0.el5.mh rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 Informatia in sine ( ca fisiere ) provine din wine-*.rpm , nu din wine.rpm _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
