Petru Paler wrote:
>
> E bine si frumos ce zici tu, dar ultima data cand am incercat nu am
> reusit sa pun si reiserfs si XFS in acelasi kernel. S-a mai schimbat ceva ?
> Il intrebi tu pe tipu' ala din partea mea ? :)
Mark Hounschell wrote:
>
> > Is it possible right now to have both XFS and ReiserFS in the kernel?
> > (and maybe use them simultaneously, on different partitions)
>
> Just yesterday I got it working. You must apply the reiser patch first
> then the XFS patch. I now have a 17g resier and a 17g xfs partition on
> my
> system coexsisting. I just finished last night and haven't really tested
> it much. 2 problems that I am having are, first the 2gb LFS isn't
> working
> with the reiser but does work with the XFS. The second problem is
> with the xfs. It may show up with the reiser also once I figure out the
> 2gb file size problem. When I do an ls, any file that is larger the 2gb
> gives some message about something too large to stat. The file is there
> and I can actually read it. (JUST a large tar ball). You want to start
> with the vanilla 2.4.0 sources and what ever updates it requires. (See
> Doc/Changes), apply the reiser first the the xfs patches.
> While I'm here does anyone know anything about the 2 problems I
> descibed above.
>
> 1. No LFS support in reiser
> 2. On an XFS fs, doing an ls in a directory that has a file larger then
> 2+gb gives a message about to large to stat.
--
Florin Andrei
"Saying everything is a database is saying nothing at all
and certainly will not improve communication with others.
Database, database database. Database! See?" (Marc Lehmann)
---
Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to
unsubscribe from this list.
