On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:26:19PM +0200, Bogdan Marinca wrote:
> [root@lan-202 hda3]# df
> Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
> 5615184 4136000 1479184 74% /
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3
> 4031680 3559076 267804 93% /mnt/hda3
>
> reiserfs: "Used" - "du -ks /" = 4136000K - 3490047K = 645953K
> ext2: "Used" - "du -ks /" = 3559076K - 3559060K = 16K
>
> Oare de ce overhead`ul la reiserfs este asa de mare (645953KB) ?
Nu e overhead.
Din http://www.reiserfs.org/faq.html :
"""
du says reiserfs makes space efficiency worse.
use df not du, or use "raw" option for du if your du supports that,
st_blocks summed up is less accurate than st_size for reiserfs because
we pack tails, and st_blocks rounds numbers up.
"""
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
---
Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to
unsubscribe from this list.
