On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Catalin Braica wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul wrote: > > > > > > si iptables -t filter -A INPUT -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j ACCEPT > > > ^^^^^ trebuie tot FORWARD (INPUT e numai > > > pentru ce vine pentru hostul local). > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ io nu te cred ... tu te crezi ? > eu testai, si trebuie intr-adevar FORWARD, era eroarea mea > citat : > [...] > The tables are as follows: filter This is the default table, and > contains the built-in > chains INPUT (for packets coming into the box itself), > FORWARD (for packets being routed > through the box), cred si io acum ... ----- some day i'll make a real .signature ... --- Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to unsubscribe from this list.
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Paul Dorneanu [root]
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Bogdan Eugen Daja
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Paul Dorneanu [root]
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Tarhon-Onu Victor
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Paul Dorneanu [root]
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains 092.853.212
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Catalin Braica
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains ionut.spirlea
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Catalin Braica
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains ionut.spirlea
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Tarhon-Onu Victor
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains ionut.spirlea
- [rlug] Re: iptables vs ipchains Florin Andrei
- [rlug] procmail A.Berdan
- [rlug] Re: procmail Camelia Nastase
- [rlug] Re: procmail A.Berdan
- [rlug] Re: procmail teo
- [rlug] Re: procmail A.Berdan
- [rlug] Re: procmail teo
