am citit in linux weekly news ca reiserfs este cel mai lent dintre sitemele de fisiere si ca daca vrei sa obtii o performanta mai buna in detrimentul spatiului pe hardisk sa adaugi optiunea -notails la comanda mount. Fiind cam un incepator in linux nu as vrea sa modifica fisiere la intamplare (cred ca /etc/fstab) si sa nu mai poata sa imi monteze partitia de root asa ca apelez la voi ca sa ma ajutai daca puteti. 10x p.s -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Journaling filesystem performance comparison Andrew Theurer (of IBM) has posted the results of a performance comparison between several Linux filesystems. The standard ext2 filesystem beat all of the journaling filesystems by a fair amount; JFS was the fastest among the journaling systems. ReiserFS came in last in this set of tests. It turns out that Randy Dunlap, too, has been testing journaling filesystems . He is using a different benchmarking tool, but has come up with roughly similar results. The ReiserFS testing, as it turns out, was done with a default mount option that reduces performance (but which saves disk space). People interested in performance in ReiserFS should mount with the -notails option. The above tests will be rerun with that option, but no results had been posted as of "press" time. " -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ~ KrAzY ~ --- Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to unsubscribe from this list.
