Confirm. Pe Athlon, daca imaginea e sub 600x252 atunci mplayer foloseste ceva de genul 3% cpu iar uptime e ca si 0. Daca depasesti 600x252 cpu-ul sare la 13-23%. De ce, nu stiu. O fi o chestie de cache presupun.
Ionut PS bineintels doar cu ffdivx. celelalte codecuri nu coboara sub 20%. On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:39:51AM +0200, Mircea MITU wrote: > On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 18:14, mmihai wrote: > > > Va rog sa-mi recomandati un player DivX pentru Linux. > > Repet ce au spus multi altii: mplayer este exceptional. > > si daca optezi pt mplayer, la divx-uri merge sa bagi optiunea > -vc ffdivx care foloseste un decodor ultra rapid de dai clasa la > (aproape, ca nu le'am incercat pe) toate playerele de divx-uri de win. > > pe bune, diferenta este vizibila. > > > --- > Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to > unsubscribe from this list. -- *************** * Ionut Georgescu * http://www.physik.tu-cottbus.de/~george/ * Registered Linux User #244479 * * "In Windows you can do everything Microsoft wants you to do; in Unix you * can do anything the computer is able to do." --- Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to unsubscribe from this list.
