Asa l-am gasit pe net. On Tuesday 05 February 2002 05:51 pm, you wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Amelian Serghei wrote: > > # > > # Encrypted attachements can not be searched: > > # > > > > :0 > > > > * ^content-type:.*multipart/((signed)|(encrypted)); > > ! alert@localhost > > Ok, inteleg ca ai ceva cu encripted. Dar cu signed... cred ca exagerezi. > Ce daca omul semneaza digital emailul? Nu stiu nici un cod ciudat > transmisibil prin semnatura. > > > Flower --- Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to unsubscribe from this list.
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, e... Tarhon-Onu Victor
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, etc Amelian Serghei
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, etc Paul-Gabriel Maravei
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, etc Raini
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, etc Viorel Anghel
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, etc Tarhon-Onu Victor
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, etc Florin Andrei
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, etc Amelian Serghei
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, etc Flower
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, etc Amelian Serghei
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, etc Florin Andrei
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .exe, e... Amelian Serghei
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .ex... Mircea Ciocan
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .ex... Mircea MITU
- [rlug] Re: sendmail reject .com, .ex... gotto
