Hi Alin!
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Nu ma incurca. Problema e ca nu vreau sa am o tabela de rutare in care
> sa nu mai inteleg nimic.
> Si asa am vreo 10 intrari in ea ;). Ar mai fi si o problema de
> optimizare (de ce sa ocup memoria aiurea?).
>
[root@xxx root]# ip r | wc -l
539
[root@xxx root]# procinfo
Linux 2.4.17 (root@xxx) (gcc 2.96 20000731 ) #2 1CPU [xxx]
Memory: Total Used Free Shared Buffers Cached
Mem: 284948 277908 7040 0 50796 176676
Swap: 129020 252 128768
Bootup: Sun Mar 24 13:22:44 2002 Load average: 0.12 0.08 0.08 2/26 5853
user : 2:25:15.65 3.6% page in : 505765
nice : 0:00:33.16 0.0% page out: 1643957
system: 0:44:33.82 1.1% swap in : 1
idle : 2d 16:59:04.21 95.3% swap out: 11
uptime: 2d 20:09:26.83 context : 17593833
irq 0: 24536684 timer irq 9: 3909520 eth2
irq 1: 5 keyboard irq 10: 6082079 eth1
irq 2: 0 cascade [4] irq 12: 1914839 eth0
irq 6: 2 irq 15: 407332 ide1
daca faci used-cached-buffer ies vreo 50M, si masina mai ruleaza si alte stutze
pe langa bgpd si zebra.
in plus este mult mai elegant asa decat sa faci `hack-uri' cu scripturi si alea.
--teodor
---
Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to
unsubscribe from this list.
