> > Apropos, cum arata o intrare in loagele lui Apache (updatat)
^^^^^^^
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Sorin CONSTANTINESCU wrote:
>
>
> pai, cam asa arata:
>
>
> === cut here ===
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:38 2002] [notice] child pid 20744 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:38 2002] [notice] child pid 20743 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20806 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20805 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20804 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20803 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20802 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20801 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20800 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20799 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20798 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20797 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20796 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20795 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Mon Jun 24 16:43:40 2002] [notice] child pid 20794 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> === and here ===
>
>
> [adonay@XXX apache]$ grep -c "exit signal Segmentation" error_log
> 133010
> [adonay@XXX apache]$
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Radu Filip wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 13:52:53 +0300 (EEST)
> > From: Radu Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [rlug] Re: despre apache vuln
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Paul Dorneanu wrote:
> >
> > > 1. RH a zis ca Apache nu ar trebui sa fie o problema :
> > >
> > > Our investigations show that this bug cannot be used to gain remote access
> > > to a server running Apache on Red Hat Linux on 32-bit platforms, but it
> > > does cause the child process to die. The Apache parent process will
> > > notice this and start a new child process when necessary -- using more
> > > resources than normal.
> >
> > Apropos, cum arata o intrare in loagele lui Apache (updatat) in cazul
> > cand cineva umbla cu prostii si incearca sa se foloseasca de bug-ul asta
> > "proaspat"?
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Pentru dezabonare, trimiteti mail la
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] cu subiectul 'unsubscribe rlug'.
> > REGULI, arhive si alte informatii: http://www.lug.ro/mlist/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Sorin Pufarin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Registered User #222086
>
> ---
> Pentru dezabonare, trimiteti mail la
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cu subiectul 'unsubscribe rlug'.
> REGULI, arhive si alte informatii: http://www.lug.ro/mlist/
>
>
---
Pentru dezabonare, trimiteti mail la
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cu subiectul 'unsubscribe rlug'.
REGULI, arhive si alte informatii: http://www.lug.ro/mlist/
