Doom wrote:
 >
 > ... �n data de 15 Aug 2002 Andrei Vlad Pascal a povestit:
 >
 >
 >>sau daca eshti jmeker pui si tu un adaptor care sa scoata tensiune ceva
 >>mai mare decat iti trebe tie si asa compensezi pierderile pe cablu. Au
 >>facut unii o faza d-asta si au alimentat ditai modemu radio. Care a mers
 >>vreo 3 ani fara nici o pb.! (Modemu si antena erau la vreo 50 m de
 >>compu' cu pricina - da, se alimenta de la 12 V din computer, scula
 >>mergand la 6 V. vreo 4-6 V se pierdeau pe cablu :)) )
 >
 >
 > LOL :) Asta da calcul precis!!! Made in .ro!!! Si eu recunosc ca am
 > incercat pe sarma aia de 120m mai multe tensiuni, dar la nici una nu a
 > raspuns cum trebuie , asa ca am rugat pe cineva la o casa din apropierea
 > hub-ului sa ma lase sa trag curent de la ei ... se rezolva lunar cu o
 > plasa de fructesi ciocolati pentru copilasi galbeni de grasi! :)
 >
 > Cosmin


Hai sa ma dau si eu rotund:
normal sa "se piarda" ceva voltzi pe cablu, ca doar rezulta o rezistenta 
alimentata care alta treaba decat sa "manance" curent si sa produca 
caldura nu are :-))))

la o plimbare mica pe net, am gasit si teste+numere exacte, scuze de 
dimensiunea mailului:

The DC resistance of Cat5 is about three ohms per hundred feet per 
conductor, so for 250 foot cable had at least seven (7) ohms resistance. 
Most of the time the APs draw much less than 0.8A, so you were still 
above 6V at the AP. In fact, the access points are probably just using 
linear regulators down to 5V on their insides, so as long as you're 
giving them something better than 6V at the terminals they're likely to 
work, but at 500 feet they didn't because the voltage drop was too high 
once they started turning on. -- Scott Carter

Conclusion- The maximum segment distance for Ethernet 10BaseT is 330 
feet (100 meters) (specified in IEEE 802.3), so this PoE setup should 
work at the maximum segment distance with the stock voltage outputs of 
the DC transformers (depending upon your access point and DC transformer).

500 Feet of Cable Testing Addendum (2001 May 05)- This setup was 
additionally tested with 500 feet of CAT 5 cabling, 170 feet more than 
is allowed for ethernet specifications. The ethernet signal worked over 
the 500 feet of cabling at both 10baseT speed (Apple Airport) and 
100BaseT (Ugate 3300) with no problems. The DC power however did have 
problems. Both access points would power up (i.e. the lights would come 
on), but they would not fully initialize and function. I don't really 
consider this a problem with this hack since your not supposed to use 
500 feet of cabling for ethernet anyway.

Check the packaging, documentation, or the bottom of the device to find 
out how much current it draws. Usually it'll be between 50 and 90% of 
what the transformer can supply. (If the device ships with a 1500ma 
transformer, expect it to draw around 1200 at peak, and normal operating 
current should be around 1000.) These numbers are based on my experience 
alone.

You can fix this by using a higher voltage transformer to overcome the 
drop. Be careful! This is why I said to find the actual power draw of 
the device. You want to do all your testing using a large power resistor 
which draws approximately as much power as the device. When you've found 
the correct transformer voltage, doublecheck your polarity and try it 
with the device again. The caveat here is that your new transformer 
rating assumes the resistance that you tested it with. If you find a 
transformer that works over 500 feet of cable, and you run it over 100 
feet, you've changed the resistance. Current draw (the device) is the 
same, but resistance has gone down, so voltage drop goes down. Ergo, the 
actual voltage reaching the device will go UP, and you might cook something.

Electrical Math (thanks to Ryan Cole for emailing this)

Wire gauge / Ohms per 1000ft
20 / 10
22 / 16
24 / 25
28 / 65

The TIA-568 spec which defines Cat5 (cat 3 as well) specifies that 
either one shall be no more than 9.38 ohms per 100 meters. Our testing 
of name brand Cat 5 says more like seven ohms per 100 meters, so 3 ohms 
per hundred feet is safe and conservative. -- Scott Carter

Ohms Law
E = IR (Volts = Amps x Resistance)

We'll say 22 Guage wire at 250 Ft under a 1 Amp load....
22 Gauge @ 250 Ft = 4 Ohms
E = 1 x 4 or E = 4 Volts
So basically you should expect 4 Volts consumed leaving you 8 volts at 
the AP end.

Lets do another situation... 28 Gauge over 50 ft at 2 amps....
28 Guage @ 50 ft = 3 Ohms
E = 2 x 3 or E = 6 Volts
So in this case you dissipate half your volts... could be bad, or if I 
calculate correctly, possibly worse...

6 Volts x 2 Amps = 12 Watts dissipated over the wire
12 Watts / 50 Ft = .24 Watts per foot

I would not expect that to start a fire outright, but you could use it 
to keep your pipes from freezing in the winter.

So sunt bune iarna :-))))

C


---
Pentru dezabonare, trimiteti mail la 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cu subiectul 'unsubscribe rlug'.
REGULI, arhive si alte informatii: http://www.lug.ro/mlist/


Raspunde prin e-mail lui