okay atunci sa detaliem
masina A:
eth0 1.2.3.4
eth0:0 192.168.0.100
rute:
Destination Gateway Genmask Interface
1.2.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 eth0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 lo
0.0.0.0 1.2.3.1 0.0.0.0 eth0
aici ruleaza un apache care asculta pe 0.0.0.0:80 si 0.0.0.0:15000
masina B (routerul):
eth0: 1.2.3.1
eth1: 192.168.0.1
rute:
Destination Gateway Genmask Interface
1.2.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 eth0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 eth1
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 lo
0.0.0.0 nuconteaza 0.0.0.0 eth0
masina C:
eth0: 192.168.0.2
rute:
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 eth0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 eth0
toate trei sint infipte in acelasi switch. se dezactiveaza toate
regulile de firewall mai putin cea de masq pentru 192.168.0.0 pe router
(B)
de pe masina A: telnet 192.168.0.100 80 sau 192.168.0.100 15000 merge ok
de pe masina C: telnet 192.168.0. 80 merge ok
telnet 192.168.0.100 15000 connection failed
(instant)
idem de pe masina B.
am observat ca chestia asta se intimpla pentru toate porturile mai mari
de 1024
ceva sugestii ?
"Live to Win, Dare to Fail" - James Hetfield
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alin Nastac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:27 AM
Subject: [rlug] Re: eth0:0
> Cred ca vrei sa spui "pe IP-ul pus pe un eth0:0".
>
> Desigur. Care ar fi scopul alias-urilor altfel?
>
> Dan Uscatu wrote:
>
> >se pot binda servicii pe o interfata alias ?
> >
> >"Live to Win, Dare to Fail" - James Hetfield
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
