On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 02:10, MihaiM wrote:
> On Saturday 13 December 2003 01:35, Alexandru Ungur wrote:
> > Dec 12 13:08:56 consulting smbd[32303]: [2003/12/12 13:08:56, 0]
> > lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(342)
> > Dec 12 13:08:56 consulting smbd[32303]: read_socket_data: recv failure
> > for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer
> > Dec 12 14:42:16 consulting smbd[29408]: [2003/12/12 14:42:16, 0]
> > lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(342)
> > Dec 12 14:42:16 consulting smbd[29408]: read_socket_data: recv failure
> > for 4. Error = No route to host
>
> Pare ca de aici pleaca tot, restul erorilor sunt cauzate de o problema de
> comunicare. Faptul ca o cautare dupa mesajul de eroare de mai sus, a intros
> erori de pe vremea lui samba 2.0.6, ma face sa cred ca nu este problema de la
> samba, ci de la kernel/driver placa de retea.
> Eu as incepe prin a compila un kernel oficial, sa vad daca erorile se repeta.
> Nu ne-ai spus ce placa de retea ai. O alta idee ar fi sa o schimbi cu alt
> model.
00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100]
00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100]
# ifconfig eth1
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:D0:B7:0E:AA:7B
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:507431 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:571212 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:1 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:85937201 (81.9 Mb) TX bytes:449602500 (428.7 Mb)
Interrupt:12 Base address:0xe800 Memory:eb201000-eb201038
Daca tot pare sa fie o problema de comunicatie nu poate sa fie
switch-ul? Intreb deoarece la server nu am schimbat nimic in
configuratia hardware insa am cumparat cu ceva vreme in urma un switch
surecom iar inainte aveam un hub.
Alex
---
Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
