On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:19:17PM +0200, Lorin wrote: > Acu' privind articolul ala http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/ipv6mess.html si in IMHO: > 2. "It gets worse. The IPv6 designers don't have a transition plan. They've > taken some helpful steps, but they typically declare success (``IPv6 > support'') when the real problem---making public IPv6 addresses work just as > well as public IPv4 addresses---still hasn't been solved." > > Trecerea se face treptat pana cand providerii majori o sa aiba o > infrastructura puternica ipv6 si o sa ofere o alternativa de conectare pentru > clienti. Parerea mea e ca in viitor o sa ajunga la o situatie exact inversa: > retele+aplicatii pentru ipv6 dar incompatibile ipv4, asa ca nu cred ca exista > o solutie perfecta pentru niste schimbari majore, doar ceva compromisuri (a > se citi manareli). Cam ceea ce vreau sa fac io. Atunci apuca-te de scris jucarie pentru NAT-ul de care vorbeai. :-) > 3. "Wake up, folks: The ``combined v4/v6 network'' is a bad joke. Without a > coherent transition plan, IPv6 has no credibility. I'm certainly not going to > waste time implementing half-baked plans; I want to see a plan that, if > implemented and universally deployed, will produce the magic moment." > > Bad joke ? Ma indoiesc ca pe 13/13/2013 la ora 13:13, cand o sa deschid > calcatorul nu o sa mearga dintr-o data pingu' clasic, doar ping6...
E cam dezorganizata treaba, sa stii. :-) > 4. "For example, some people make quite a fuss about replacing IPv4 with IPv6 > as a mechanism for computers that aren't on the Internet to talk to the local > proxies. Wake up, folks: That isn't the problem we need to solve. We can, and > do, use private 10.* IPv4 addresses to talk to proxies. The address crunch > involves public IPv4 addresses; to fix it, we need public IPv6 addresses that > can talk to all the same sites." > > Se poate trece oare mai usor de la o retea cu ip-uri private v4 la o retea cu > ip-uri publice v6, decat una cu ipv6 ? Nu, dar nu vad ce legatura are. > 5. "As another example, some people focus on building optional connections > from the IPv4 Internet to a big new IPv6 network. (If you see discussion of > how ``IPv6-only'' computers might talk to ``IPv4-only'' computers, you're > looking at one of those plans.) Wake up, folks: Nobody will join your IPv6 > network if it can't talk to Google, CNN, etc. We need practically every > computer on the Internet to talk to the IPv6 network." > > Chestia asta poate fi rezolvata de configuratia care am propus-o. Si pentru care nu exista solutie. :-) -- Birzan George Violence is the last refuge of Cristian the incompetent -- Salvor Hardin --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
