On Friday 09 April 2004 17:26, Lorin wrote: > 1. rfc 2865: > "If the client receives an Access-Challenge and supports > challenge/response it MAY display the text message, if any, to the > user, and then prompt the user for a response. The client then re- > submits its original Access-Request with a new request ID, with the > User-Password Attribute replaced by the response (encrypted), and > including the State Attribute from the Access-Challenge, if any. > Only 0 or 1 instances of the State Attribute SHOULD be > present in a request. The server can respond to this new Access- > Request with either an Access-Accept, an Access-Reject, or another > Access-Challenge." > > Aici nu imi e clara o cheste. Folosirea unui shared secret e optionala ? Acu' e clara. "A request from a client for which the RADIUS server does not have a shared secret MUST be silently discarded." > 2. Ceva success stories cu pam+radius ? > -- > Lorin > I tought i taw a putty cat...I did! I did taw a putty cat! > > --- > Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
-- Lorin I tought i taw a putty cat...I did! I did taw a putty cat! --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
