On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 13:56 +0300, Radu Radoveneanu wrote: > > (The 1600 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered) > > Port State Service > > 22/tcp closed ssh > > No exact OS matches for host (test conditions non-ideal). > > TCP/IP fingerprint: > > SInfo(V=3.00%P=i386-slackware-linux-gnu%D=9/7%Time=413D8FA4%O=-1%C=22) > > T5(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=S++%Flags=AR%Ops=) > > T5(Resp=Y%DF=Y%W=FAF0%ACK=S++%Flags=AS%Ops=MNW) > > T5(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=S++%Flags=AR%Ops=) > > T6(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=O%Flags=R%Ops=) > > T7(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=S++%Flags=AR%Ops=) > > PU(Resp=N) > y0 r0x0rz !!!! acum spune-mi si mie ca nu inteleg, ce iti arata la nmap pe > ip-ul ala ?
de "ip-ul ala" spune ca are in spate pe cineva care a pus un firewall. insa ne mai spune ca nmap a fost rulat de pe un slack (prolly 9.x) :) -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
