Claudiu Cireasa wrote: >problema era cu ip-ul care nu era o adresa de retea ci era prima adresa din >clasa... >am rezolvat-o >multumesc pentru ajutor. > >Pe 20 Apr 2005, la 21:34, Bogdan Rotariu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a scris: > > > >>Claudiu Cireasa wrote: >> >> >> >>># route add -net 80.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.240 gw 81.y.y.y dev eth1 >>>route: netmask doesn't match route address >>> >>> >>sigur e bun netmaskul ? >> >> >>>#ip route add 80.x.x.x/28 via 81.y.y.y dev eth1 - aceeasi problema ca cea >>>din mailul anterior >>>clasa 81.y.y.0/24 este in spatele routerului si merge (stie ca e pe eth1) >>> >>> Eroare! IP-ul declarat cu via trebuie sa fie _direct_ accesibil ruterului linux (as in reachable without any intermediate hops). e.g. daca tu ai 192.168.1.1/24 iar in spatele lui 192.168.1.5 exista o retea cu 192.168.2.0/24, atunci ruta trebuie declarata cu: ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.1.5
-- Linux assumes you're smart, so it's easy to do stupid things. Windows assumes you're stupid, therefore makes it hard to do smart things. -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- -- File: signature.asc -- Desc: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCZqmlRZBYwhawvi4RAj35AKCTAvQfMc7ziQg+Kkc0cQPm45QqfgCglOa8 WRt2Giu1qhdXC6iArl08i0M= =sWJN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
