Ruset Zeno wrote: > sunt de acord cu ce scrie in articol dar mie mi se pare ca argumenteaza > de ce pozitia lui Ballmer nu e corecta, nu ca afirmatia nu ar fi adevarata. > In plus ambele citeaza, cred, acelasi studiu.
amandoi citeaza studiul respectiv intr-un mod vadit eronant: intre "283 patente nevalidate care ar putea fi folosite potential impotriva linux" si "linux incalca peste 200 patente" e o diferenta la fel de mare ca intre a spune ca MJ ar putea fi pedofil si a dovedi in justitie ca este ;) studiul original: http://www.osriskmanagement.com/press_releases/press_release_080204.pdf citatul original: "The bad news is that we identified 283 issued patents that have not yet been litigated, and contain claims that could conceivably be brought against Linux end-users and create financial exposure if found valid. And, of course, not-yet-issued patents could create similar problems. But, the good news is that none of the fully litigated patents we reviewed contain claims that cover Linux.” --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
