And if you have to use Micro$oft products, this handy guide will atleast tell you what applications are infection candidates http://www.sqlsecurity.com/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabindex=10&tabid=13
christopher On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 10:19, Garrett Taylor wrote: > I blame IT managers for this. By now they should know that Microsoft > products are susceptible to these sorts of things given the sloppy source > code. The company I work for has both Linux and Microsoft servers including > a SQL-2000 server. Our server has a Linux server between it and the > Internet. The only mode of pass-through is through Apache to PHP to MSSQL. > I'd love to see a worm break through that. The only things I'll expose to > the Internet are Linux and firmware-only devices such as Cisco. If you need > to have a connection through the Internet to an SQL server you should be > running a VPN of some sort like CIPE. > > -----Original Message----- > From: C. Richard Matson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:48 PM > To: Reno Linux Users Group > Subject: [RLUG] Re: Slammer > > > Here iis some interesting reading. Rich > > http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/biztech/01/28/microsoft.worm.ap/index.html > _______________________________________________ > RLUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug > _______________________________________________ > RLUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
