So, are you're saying that since they have so many shareholders, institutional and individual alike, that these shareholders need to convice the organizations they work for to stick with their proprietary MS software, even if it is not in the best interests of the organization itself, merely to keep the stock price 'propped up'?

Fred Ramsing wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Ryan Finnie wrote:

The whole "Government Security Program" is a laugh though... they're scared because of the penetration of linux in government, and are adopting a "sure, they give away souce and are free, but we'll let you look at some of our source and we're a big company, so we're better!" stance.

That's not the half of it.  Micro$haft is warning all investors that if
open source software succeed, tech revenues and stocks will plummet
starting with Micro$haft.  Therefore, according to their warning (or
threat), it is in the best interests of investors to stick with
proprietary, platform-dependent, and backwards technology.  Kind of like
saying that if you owned stock in typewriter companies in the 1970's and
1980's that you shouldn't have purchased PC's when they came out.

Given their share as a Fortune500, I consider Micro$haft's statement to be
a deliberate threat.

My $0.02.


Fred

_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug



_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug

Reply via email to