That was the conclusion I reached when I looked at OpenExchange. Although I did not see that it was a 100% replacement for Exchange, I did note that I would end up paying more to run OpenExchange on a Linux server than I would for Exchange/Windows. Didn't seem like I was getting any bang for the buck.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Ramsing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [RLUG] Exchange Replacements > > > On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Bill Cunningham wrote: > > Linux journal did an article a few months back about a > > group of developers that made an exchange replacement. They > > were able to completely replace the exchange server with > > all functionality ( at least if I remember right.) > > Linux Journal did an article in November 2003, which is not available > online, that discussed the cracking of the Exchange headers (really > encrypted IMAP stuff). However, the work was performed for Suse > Openexchange Server, which is not open source. Openexchange > is meant to > be a full service replacement for M$ Exchange with direct support for > Outlook clients, but it costs more than Windoze 2003 Small Business > Server (~$1,000 for Openexchange versus $700 for Windoze 2003 > SBS), which > comes with Windoze 2003 Server, SQL Server 2000, and Exchange. > > > Fred > > _______________________________________________ > RLUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug > _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
