> > Out of curiosity what services is NAT not feasible for? The only thing I > > can think of is running p2p servers or such.
One example that comes to mind immediately is FTP. FTP fails to work properly on true NAT devices. As a solution to this problem, many NAT developers have found themselves having to write "helper" modules to handle various protocols. Now, because of helper modules that alter data in transit, NAT is generally able to handle FTP reliably. But unfortunately you cannot design a helper module for every protocol ever developed that would need such a thing. _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
