-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 09:02:34AM -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > Then again, mutt's inline support is pretty broken, IMHO. Most Windows > users use inline PGP, and not PGP/MIME, so I think Pine's third-party > utilities come out ahead on that one.
Hrm... well unless you mean inline attachments I've never had a problem I just hit 'S'ign and 'I'nline. > I find that, when dealing with newbies or non-technical folks, Reply-To > is important because otherwise they throw up their hands in clueless > frustration. But technical people should know better (and anyone using > Linux *ought* to be striving for more technical competence), and > *forcing* reply-to seems to go against the grain somehow. I'm fine with being newbie friendly. There's also the possibility of explaining how to reply to the list in the initial subscription confirmation. Not that anyone reads these things. ;) peace, core -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCRZhZGAuLrxOyeJMRAsl8AKDRBVnARVUEnrvWjG7Iekq4aTuzJQCg6BpZ x/4Ljrt44MSq0LOXDxdoojc= =7WJ9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
