The linux mentor program does sound like a very good idea. Maybe we could 
incorporate this idea into the RLUG. Perhaps a page where those who wish to be 
available can post their email address optional phone number, area of 
knowledge, etc on the Wiki. I know I would be willing to volunteer some of my 
time to further the cause.

Damon

----- Start Original Message -----
From: Bill Roddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Damon Jacobsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RLUG] Topic request

> Damon Jacobsen wrote:
> > In the development category, perhaps maybe a talk on init.d scrips and 
> > perhaps the whole systemV scheme. I know I would like to know how to write 
> > these scrips with commonly accepted practices.
> > 
> > Damon 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Start Original Message -----
> > From: Sebastian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [RLUG] Topic request
> > 
> > 
> >>Hi All,
> >>
> >>Any ideas for a topic for next month?  I was thinking about a topic 
> >>related to development, but since our turnout wasn't very good last month 
> >>perhaps we should do something different.
> >>
> >>Has anyone found a new location to host our meeting?
> >>
> >>- Sebastian
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>RLUG mailing list
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > ----- End Original Message -----
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > RLUG mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
> > 
> 
> There is an interesting article at NewsForge.com this week, called, "Why 
> Linux Needs A Mentor Program.
> 
> This is the link:
> 
> http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/09/13/1816200
> 
> I think it's a topic worthy of discussion, if not consideration, among 
> all LUGs.
> 
> Since attendance has been said to be low, I think there is a way fix 
> that. I would like to suggest that all meetings be broken into two 
> distinct sections. The first part strictly for the resolution of 
> problems for new or intermediate Linux "users," that is to say, people 
> who just use or want to use Linux, and do not have the technical 
> expertise some of you do, and who do not intend to write programs or 
> administer systems. (And please, do not call them "newbies." That term 
> is so off-putting to those of us who struggle alone to breech the walls 
> of Penguin World.)
> 
> During that time, which should be designated and promoted, ANY question, 
> not matter how trivial it might seem, should be welcomed. A repository 
> of these Q&A's from the meetings could be kept on the Web site. I think 
> it would be of great benefit to those who ask, and eye-opening for those 
> who answer. I think there can be presumptions made by Linux gurus about 
> what should or should not be simple to new and intermediate users. 
> Sometimes, we assume to much. The intimidation factor is still very high 
> for those who might teeter on the brink of disappointment with 
> Microsoft, with no soft place to fall.
> 
> Clearly, there should be a second part of the meeting that deals with 
> more complex issues, such as the ones I see frequently discussed in the 
> mail group.
> 
> My next suggestion is not for the upcoming meeting, but one in the 
> future, and would involve inviting as many computer-skills educators as 
> possible to a meeting, to give them a demonstration of Linux, and to 
> pass out to them copies of live-CD versions of Linux they could play 
> with, along with the assurance that if they decide to pursue the topic 
> further, they could contact the RLUG and it could refer them to a person 
> or persons who could help them pursue a windowless world.
> 
> I feel EXTREMELY awkward, recommending a topic for a meeting that I 
> can't attend. But I would be there, if my health would allow, because 
> I'd like the privilege of meeting you all. And I know the time 
> constraints many of you already have prevent you from being all you 
> would like to be in the Linux world. As such, these recommendations can 
> be taken with whatever level of seriousness you find appropriate.
> 
> Yet, I can't help but believe that factoring in the real, clear and 
> present needs of new and intermediate users can benefit everyone. Once 
> cannot teach something without learning something. It's a win/win situation.
> 
> If this topic set has been discussed before, and resolved, I apologize 
> in advance. Meanwhile, thank you all for your support and insight.
> 
> Bill
> 
> -- 
> Web site: http://life-and-times.net (This, too, is life)
> Blog: http://www.life-and-times.net/blog.html
> AIM: trogon gigas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RLUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
> 

----- End Original Message -----

_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug

Reply via email to