Jeff Shippen wrote:

What does it all mean?


A lot of judges have apparently been saying that they don't have the authority to refuse an injunction when it appears a patent is being violated. By granting the injunction, this means that the target company has to immediately stop using the 'technology' or they're criminally liable for violating a court order. This all happens before a trial and before an actual ruling on the validity of the contested patent. From what I can tell, this supreme court decision tells the lower courts to consider the proper precedent rulings, which give the courts a four point test in patent cases as to whether to grant an injunction. Supposedly part of the commentary in the decision targetted patent-hoarding lawyer companies which do not actually use patents themselves with the exception of suing people. The supreme court acknolwedge that granting an injunction in many cases is basically pre-deciding a case, as the company being sued may be improperly crippled before an actual ruling on the patent's validity. This can force a big company (like ebay or amazon) to settle an unjustified lawsuit not based on the merits of the patent, but based on the court's injunction.

One of the main problems I see with patent-hoarding lawyer companies, is that they basically apply an asymmetrical threat. Since the patent system has basically been turned into a minefield, they incur no liability since they don't bother to enter the minefield. Meanwhile, any company which actually wants to get something done is forced into the minefield in order to achieve anythign at all. You don't see patent litigation between large companies very often, because they all have large patent portfolios... when it comes down to anything but core patents, they don't often resort to lawsuits, as a) it doesn't really accomplish anything and b) they're probably violating With a patent-troll firm, since they don't build anything, they have no potential liability.

Quoting n a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
http://opensourcepimp.com/open_source_u_s_supreme_court_deals_a_blow_to_patent_trolls

_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug


_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug

Reply via email to