I've used cvs and svn fairly extensively. I'm not completely
comfortable with the way branches are done in svn, but I can't find
anything other than "it's not what I'm used to from cvs" as a reason for
the discomfort.
I've looked at darcs quite a bit, and it theoretically looks like it has
a real advantage in merging disparate work (ie, stuff that would create
conflicts in other software may not do so in darcs). It isn't designed
as a client-server type of application, though you can make web and
procmail hacks to simulate such a thing. That lack of centralization is
a kinda scary proposal for the projects I generally work on. :)
n a wrote:
CVS, Subversion, darcs, or GNU Arch?
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
RLUG@rlug.org
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
RLUG@rlug.org
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
