Dear all, I have almost finished an implementation of changing the lastChange attribute, taking a recommendation from EdMerks on from one of the forums from 2009. During my test, I noticed that ProR seems to use a specific concept of what the affected object of e.g. the setting of an attribute seems to be.
When the attribute of a SpecObject is modified, the it seems that ProR overrides that so that the related SpecHierarchy is the affectedObject. Is that true? What is the intention behind that? I would have expected that the affected object really is the "affected object", i.e. either the attribute value or the specObject. Best Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Graf Business Development Manager Automotive Spokesperson Eclipse Automotive Industry WG Mobil: +49 (0) 151-10860479 (preferred) Tel.: +49 (0) 711 / 34 21 91-0 Fax.: +49 (0) 711 / 34 21 91-29 Web: http://www.itemis.de Mail: andreas.g...@itemis.de Xing: http://www.xing.com/profile/Andreas_Graf Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/grafandreas Blog: http://5ise.quanxinquanyi.de itemis GmbH Meitnerstr. 10 D-70563 Stuttgart Rechtlicher Hinweis: Amtsgericht Mannheim, HRB 50700996 Ust.Id.Nr.: DE250574762 Geschäftsführer: Sebastian Neus _______________________________________________ rmf-dev mailing list rmf-dev@eclipse.org http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rmf-dev
