On 24/10/05, George Cristian Bina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Which would be an error since I can't have two conflicting > > patterns? > > No because they can be in different scopes, see the sample from my > previous reply.
Noted. A *very* messy way to do that? What's wrong with a simple choice? Does illustrate usage though. - I can see why I've never found a use for it :-) > > > 'Allows a user to reference a pattern in the parent grammar'? > > That sounds ok to me, it sounds similar however with my initial description: > "Defines a reference to a named pattern in the parent grammar". Defining the pattern seems of little pragmatic use? Including? Transcludes? Makes use of... The use case is to use a pattern defined in the parent as per your address. Includes a pattern from the parent grammar by referencing its name? Makes use of.. Uses a pattern... Uses (by reference) a pattern .... I guess I'm looking for a simple sentence that captures the idea you've demonstrated? -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/2U_rlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
