On Mar 19, 2006, at 19:00, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | Is it really the best practice to use xsd:anyURI and sweep the > | discrepancies under the rug > > Yes, I think so. The definition of xsd:anyURI is pretty broad in > Schema 1.0 and in Schema 1.1 it's proposed definition[1] is: > > [Definition:] anyURI represents an Internationalized Resource > Identifier Reference (IRI). An anyURI value can be absolute or > relative, and may have an optional fragment identifier (i.e., it may > be an IRI Reference). This type should be used when the value > fulfills the role of an IRI, as defined in [RFC 3987] or its > successor(s) in the IETF Standards Track.
Is an IRI-compliant Jing-compatible datatype library implementation available already? What about absolute IRIs? > Just out of curiosity, can you describe the application where you > want this level of validity checking on IRI values? The intended application is Web Apps 1.0 aka. (X)HTML5 conformance checking. -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
